By Logan Andrew |Freewire Magazine — Your News, Your Voice
For the past two years, watching a Bucyrus City Council meeting often felt more like an endurance test than an exercise in local government. It wasn’t just the length of the sessions; it was the persistent atmosphere of procedural sniping and performative outrage. It felt as though every agenda item was a potential landmine.
However, after last week’s first full cycle of meetings for the 2026-2027 term, a different picture is beginning to emerge. The dysfunction many blamed on a “divided council” is starting to look like it may have been a leadership issue all along.
The Change in Temperature
It is only week one, and we have to be realistic: there will be arguments. There will be nights where the council disagrees, where ideology clashes, and where the debate gets heated. That is actually how government is supposed to work. Healthy disagreement is a sign of a functioning democracy. But the difference last week was that the disagreement didn’t feel personal or manufactured.
Under the new leadership of President Kevin Myers, the meetings didn’t feel like a setup for a social media clip. They felt like a business meeting. The seniority of members like Jim Mee, Terry Spiegel and Chris Mauritz, paired with the new perspectives from the incoming members, suggests that the friction of the previous term wasn’t an inherent trait of the people on the dais. It was an environment created from the top. When the leadership stopped rewarding the circus, the circus seemingly left town.
Controlling the Narrative
If you follow certain “transparency” pages on social media, you’ll see a desperate attempt to spin a different story. There is a narrative being pushed that credits this new peace to the departure of certain female members, claiming a “lack of estrogen” is the magic fix. It’s a transparent play, and it’s factually hollow. Clarissa Slater-Scheffler was still very much in the room for both the regular and committee meetings, yet the “drama” was nowhere to be found.
The reality is much simpler, though perhaps harder for the old guard to swallow. The former council president didn’t even show up for his own Sine Die portion of the meeting to close out his term. Kevin Myers ended up providing the outgoing members with their plaques because his predecessor couldn’t be bothered to show up and lead one last time. They know the truth: the common denominator for the chaos of the last two years has left the building.
The Alpha Shift
The most telling moment of the week didn’t even happen on camera. Following Tuesday’s meeting, a very direct exchange took place between new At-Large Councilman Robert Taylor and Greg White. White has spent years acting as the enforcement for the previous leadership’s agenda, but Taylor reportedly laid into him, calling out the behavior for what it was.
The result was immediate. By Thursday’s committee meetings, White was—shockingly—constructive. He wasn’t whining or grandstanding; he sat there, took the reality check on the chin, and actually provided useful info. It confirms a long-held suspicion that some public participants are simply seeking a leader to follow. If the person at the top demands substance and respect rather than conspiracy and chaos, that is what they will provide.
Boring is the New Black
The meetings last week were long, and in many ways, they were incredibly boring. They were filled with discussions about infrastructure, committee assignments, and administrative logistics. It was amazing.
We shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves. The second there is a legitimate debate or a split vote, the critics will pounce and claim the dysfunction is back. But there is a massive difference between a council that disagrees on policy and a council that is being steered into a ditch for the sake of a headline. So far, this group is choosing to be a government instead of a show. And for Bucyrus, boring is looking pretty good.
About The Author
1 thought on “The Story Behind the Story: Was the Council Dysfunctional, or Was it a Leadership Problem?The Story Behind the Story: Was the Council Dysfunctional, or Was it a Leadership Problem?”
Comments are closed.