By Logan Andrew, FreeWire Investigative Staff
DELAWARE, OH — On April 20, 2026, a series of public records requests and subsequent regional reporting led to the public release of digital communications between Judge James P. Schuck and a member of the Delaware County Prosecutor’s office. Prior to this public disclosure, FreeWire had obtained a portion of these logs from an anonymous source. These specific records were described by the source as evidence of alleged ex parte communication—a legal term referring to a judge communicating with one party in a case without the presence or knowledge of the other.
Because the identity of the sender within the message threads could not be independently verified as the Assistant Prosecutor at the time of receipt, FreeWire chose to withhold the records until they were authenticated through official channels. Following the confirmation of these records by regional outlets, including WBNS 10TV, the contents have entered the public domain. These logs provide a documented timeline that corresponds with the final proceedings of the Adam C. Stone criminal case.
Specifically, the records indicate a sustained window of communication both immediately preceding and following the sentencing hearing on August 26, 2025. This exchange began in the early morning hours, with messages recorded as late as 3:30 a.m.—just five hours before Stone appeared in court at 8:45 a.m. to receive his 54-month prison sentence.
A composite grid of published text message logs showing the early morning exchange allegedly between Judge Schuck and the plaintiff on August 26, 2025. The layout displays various timestamps and message fragments that align with the final hours before the Stone sentencing hearing.
The communications reportedly continued after the hearing concluded. According to a Motion for Judicial Release filed by Stone’s appellate counsel, these exchanges include disparaging remarks directed at the defense team and the defendant. The documented participation of an Assistant Prosecutor in the Stone case is a matter of public record. While the Delaware County Prosecutor’s Office has stated that this individual did not perform substantive work on the file, she filed a formal “Notice of Appearance” on August 12, 2025. This filing established her as an official representative of the state in the Stone litigation during the same period in which the private communications with the presiding judge were taking place.
In response to these disclosures, legal representation for Judge Schuck has issued a statement maintaining that the communications do not impact the legal standing of the Stone case. His attorney, Brad Koffel, stated that he has personally reviewed the messages and asserted that “there is nothing in those communications that in any way compromises the integrity of this case or the sentence that was imposed.” Koffel further characterized the recent legal filings by Stone’s counsel as a “strategic litigation choice” regarding the pending motion for judicial release.
The public release of these records provides the transparency needed to evaluate justice in a case that has now spanned three counties. While the conviction took place in Delaware County—a venue choice reportedly driven by the residence of the victims at the time of the offenses—Stone’s history is deeply rooted in Crawford County, where he worked and resided. Furthermore, a separate indictment for forgery currently remains active in Marion County, following allegations related to a 2022 court appearance.
The geographic spread of these legal battles raises questions regarding the initial handling of the investigation. Given that the underlying events occurred almost entirely within Bucyrus and Crawford County, local observers have questioned why the case was not prosecuted in the jurisdiction where Stone’s professional life was centered. The decision by Crawford County officials to decline the charges, leaving other jurisdictions to “pick up the pieces,” has led to speculation regarding Stone’s proximity to high-profile local cases and his familiarity with the county’s internal legal infrastructure.
Coming in Part 3: The Foundation of Insanity — A look into the high-profile Crawford County cases that provided the groundwork for this conflict and the internal warnings that were reportedly ignored.
About The Author
