Prosecutors Detail Allegations of Misused Funds, Unpaid Loans, and Social Media Influence
By Logan Andrew | FreeWire
Bucyrus Councilwoman Carolyn Shireman appeared in the Crawford County Court of Common Pleas on February 28, 2025, for her arraignment on a felony charge of theft from a person in a protected class. The charge, a second-degree felony under Ohio law (ORC 2913.02 A1 and B), stems from an indictment filed by the Crawford County grand jury on February 25, 2025.
Court Proceedings
Judge Hall presided over the hearing, where Shireman, currently in the custody of the Crawford County Sheriff, was represented by attorney Andrew Motter. Prosecutor Matt Crall laid out the allegations, highlighting several key concerns about her past and financial dealings. He noted that Shireman has prior convictions, including a 2003 telecommunication harassment case and a 2008 attempted theft conviction in Morrow County.
Crall also presented evidence that Shireman had allegedly attempted to influence the victim shortly after being interviewed by law enforcement, instructing him to claim the financial transactions in question were authorized. Additionally, he revealed that she had contacted multiple agencies, including the Crawford County Court of Developmental Disabilities and the Bureau of Criminal Investigation, demanding to know if she was under investigation. He further argued that her social media activity—where she dismissed the allegations as fabricated—could taint the jury pool.
One of the more striking allegations presented by the prosecution was that Shireman had taken money from the victim and distributed loans to friends and family, which they were later told they did not need to repay. Other expenses under scrutiny included purchases of women’s clothing, regular grooming for five dogs when the victim only owned one, and large donations to organizations like Positive Seekers, the non-profit she owns and operates. There was also mention of a disputed will, though details on that matter were not fully disclosed in court.
In response, Motter entered a not guilty plea on Shireman’s behalf and requested a personal recognizance bond, arguing that she is a lifelong resident of Crawford County with strong community ties, is 71 years old, and is not a flight risk. He acknowledged her tendency to communicate openly but argued that bond conditions could mitigate any concerns about interference in the case. He further contended that financial records would show that many of the transactions in question were for the victim’s benefit rather than personal gain.
Judge’s Ruling
After hearing arguments, the judge set two bonds: a $25,000 bond with a 10% rule and a personal recognizance (PR) bond. The purpose of the PR bond was to ensure that if Shireman were to bond out and subsequently fail to appear in court, she would face an additional fourth-degree felony charge for failure to appear. While the judge recommended that Shireman refrain from using social media, no formal order was placed against it. However, she must comply with standard bond conditions, including weekly reporting to probation and no contact with the alleged victim. The judge warned that violating these conditions could result in further felony charges.
A pretrial hearing was scheduled for March 12, 2025, at 10:30 AM.
Advertisement
🚘 For Sale: 2021 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD Custom 🚘
- 36,000 miles
- 6.6L V8 gas engine
- 1 owner, clean Carfax
- Priced $2,000 below average KBB listing!
📞 Contact: Birdie Baum — Sales & Leasing Consultant
📍 Chevrolet Buick of Bucyrus
📞 Office: 419–562–5806 | Cell: 419–569–8221
🔥 FreeWire Exclusive Perk! If you tell Birdie FreeWire sent you, take advantage of free details for a year when you stop in for an oil change! 🔥
Public and Political Reaction
Shireman’s legal troubles have sparked mixed reactions from the Bucyrus community. While some continue to stand by her, others have raised concerns over the financial allegations presented by the prosecution, particularly the nature of the unpaid loans. The case has drawn increased scrutiny over whether the transactions in question reflect mismanagement or were within legal bounds. Some argue that the case exposes a broader pattern of financial irregularities, while others insist that the accusations are politically motivated.
With the financial details at the heart of the case set to play a crucial role in the upcoming hearings, FreeWire will continue to provide updates as new developments emerge.
For more updates on Bucyrus politics and legal matters, follow FreeWire on Facebook
About the Author
Logan Andrew is the founder and editor of FreeWire, a Northwest Ohio-based digital media company dedicated to providing straightforward, fact-based reporting on local issues. With a focus on transparency and accountability, Logan works to amplify community voices while holding public officials to their word.
Support Our Work
Your support makes independent journalism like this possible. Consider contributing to FreeWire through PayPal. Every donation helps us continue to bring you the news that matters.
Donate $1- https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/PB3XJHG3ECJ4C
Donate $5- https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/DZ96VU4LKPYU6
Donate $20- https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/FPRPXSSJ72TMW
