By Logan Andrew, Editor-in-Chief | FreeWire — Your News, Your Voice
There’s a quiet wonder we all carry—an intuitive sense that sometimes, things align in ways too uncanny to ignore. A friend calls just as you’re thinking about them. You wake up moments before an emergency call comes through. You turn your head because you feel someone watching you—and you’re right. We don’t know how to measure these moments, and science often sidesteps them. But they persist. And while I don’t claim to have answers, I do believe the questions are worth asking.
Being agnostic doesn't mean being closed off. It means staying open—to possibilities, to patterns, to things we haven’t figured out yet. Not everything unexplained needs to be supernatural. But that doesn’t mean it’s meaningless either.
One of the more poetic attempts to capture these moments came from Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist and founder of analytical psychology. Jung called it synchronicity: a meaningful coincidence between internal experience and external reality—without any clear cause linking the two.
He tells the story of a patient who was stuck—resistant to progress, locked in logic. She had just finished recounting a dream in which she was given a golden scarab. At that precise moment, a gentle tapping came at Jung’s window. He turned, opened it, and in flew a golden-green beetle—of the same species that inspired the mythological scarabs of ancient Egypt. Jung handed the beetle to her and said, essentially: “Here’s your scarab.” That moment broke the dam for her therapy. It wasn’t magic. But it meant something. And that meaning is what stayed with Jung.
Fast forward to our modern, digitized world, and there are people still trying to measure that kind of mystery. Enter the Global Consciousness Project, a network of random number generators (RNGs) stationed around the world. Their goal? To see if moments of global emotion—grief, unity, shock—can cause statistically significant shifts in the randomness of machines.
On September 11, 2001, those machines began to shift. According to the project, deviations from randomness began before the first plane struck the tower, as if the world was somehow bracing itself—subconsciously or otherwise. Skeptics argue that the results are cherry-picked, or that if you test for enough patterns in enough places, you'll always find something. That’s fair criticism. But still, the data is there. And it’s weird.
It’s not just the machines, either. There are studies—admittedly fringe—that suggest people can sense when they’re being stared at. That we sometimes “know” something before we consciously process it. Or that crowds, when emotionally synchronized, behave as more than just the sum of their parts.
Now, to be clear: none of this is a call to abandon science. Quite the opposite. But science doesn’t explain everything yet—and that’s not a failure, it’s just a fact. Electricity was once invisible, too. Germs, gravity, radio waves—all unseen forces we learned to measure long after we believed in them.
And maybe that’s all synchronicity is: something real, just not measurable yet.
Maybe nothing’s out there. Or maybe there’s more than we can currently measure.
But in a world increasingly ruled by facts, figures, and feeds, I think it’s worth carving out space for something else: possibility.
